Accomplishments or No?

By -



A Charlie Kirk short shows Charlie debating a liberal college student. The student had no reply for Charlie's question: "name one accomplishment of Kamala Harris as Vice President of the country."

So, this author put that question to ChatGPT out of curiosity. 
"Please give me Kamala Harris' three greatest accomplishments as VP."

The reply from AI:
"1. Advocacy for Reproductive Rights
In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Vice President Harris became a prominent advocate for reproductive rights. She met with lawmakers from at least 18 states to discuss the issue The Week. In March 2024, she made history by visiting a Planned Parenthood clinic in Minnesota, marking the first time a sitting vice president or president had done so.

2. Leadership in Addressing Migration
Vice President Harris led the U.S. Strategy to Address the Root Causes of Migration, focusing on economic development in Central America to reduce illegal immigration. This initiative involved private sector investments and partnerships aimed at creating job opportunities and improving governance in the Northern Triangle countries. 

3. Promotion of Gun Violence Prevention
In 2023, Harris was appointed to oversee the newly established White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention. This office was tasked with implementing the administration's gun violence prevention agenda, reflecting Harris's commitment to addressing this critical issue. 

These accomplishments highlight Vice President Harris's active role in shaping key policies during her time in office."

This author's reply:
"Advocating is not an accomplishment. It's a position. The Leadership in addressing migration essentially produced nothing of value, and even if it did, her "leadership" in getting anything done is not able to be correlated to actions. Promotion of gun violence prevention accomplished zero. I literally have stopped more "gun violence" vicariously through my students. Hmmm... if that is what the internet claims are her greatest accomplishments, then she was, in fact, completely useless. Not just to rightwing folk like me, but also for those on the Left.

I daresay the men she provided oral sex for in exchange for promotion got more benefit than our country did."

This author was chided by the AI for "defamation," quoting that the claims of sexual favors are not substantiated by credible sources. Funny thing? Those "credible sources" all wanted her elected. Maybe that's why they would not do their jobs and investigate. Also, the quoted material from ChatGPT The New York Post, and Wikipedia. Not the world's more credible outlets. Pot... Kettle. 

In summary - she sucks at her job. Literally and metaphorically. 

What say you?

Comments

Post a Comment

Your comment will be displayed after approval.
Approval depends on what you say and how you say it.

Popular posts from this blog

One Week After

By -
Image
Exactly one week ago to the moment, a martyr was made. Charlie Kirk was shot for his beliefs in Christ and in the Conservative way of life. This news has dominated the headlines for the past week, and rightly so. Charlie was a man of conviction. He was bold enough to debate, yet stay civil. And while there is most certainly a time and a place for a precise shot from a marksman, this was not it. The assassin was a coward, plain and simple.  By "cutting out Charlie's tongue," the assassin did not prove Charlie a liar. He proved that he feared what Charlie had to say. I got to meet Charlie, and have some interaction with him. And when someone I love and/or admire passes, I like to think about the good things. The fun memories. And that is what this is: a fun memory.  On Sunday, October 25, 2020, Charlie came to my hometown and spoke at my church at the time. It's funny in retrospect: the Facebook event states that 450 or so people responded to the event on that platform...
Read more

This Will Trigger The Weak

By -
Image
Seen on Social Media: Your Wife Is Your First Daughter—Treat Her Like a Baby, Or She’ll Break Your Home Let’s scatter the woke table: Your wife is not your equal. She’s not your therapist. And she’s definitely not your homeboy. She’s your first daughter—emotionally, mentally, and psychologically. And the moment you start expecting her to “reason like a man” or “carry half the weight,” you’ve already lost. The modern man is confused. He's told to be vulnerable, yet punished when he shows weakness. Told to be “emotionally available,” yet abandoned when he starts crying like a choirboy. Let’s get this straight: Women were designed to be nurtured. Not negotiated with. Let’s break it down like a real father would. — 1. Every Woman Is a Grown Baby Looking for Emotional Security She’ll talk tough. She’ll claim she’s independent. But when the bills land or the pressure hits? She’s curled up in your arms, needing your shoulder—and your wallet. Why? Because biologically, her system runs on h...
Read more

A Few Updates on an Older Post

By -
This post to serve as an update on a post that is over 10 years old. The Rifleman has a strong memory (from time to time). On that post, a reader asked, "Any word? How did the remand hearing go?" For reasons that are not pertinent to this post, the Rifleman did not neglect to answer this question, but instead, postponed the answer until a more appropriate time. This time has come.  In the remand, it is important to first state a particular fact: The judge that issued the ruling, Tom Gray, retired shortly after his errant ruling. As a matter of fact, four of his last five rulings (the author's brother's ruling being one of these) were overturned in appellate courts. Divorce ruling appeal successful . In a move that still strikes this author as exceptionally odd, Gray  requested to be the judge on the remand hearing. Brother's lawyer argued that it is extremely peculiar to allow a civilian to hear a divorce remand, and the Sumner county Court agreed, and the sittin...
Read more