Latest Debate on Carry Insurance - 2
"It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled."
- Mark Twain
From yesterday's article...
Many people have left comments on my YouTube video on the topic. You can tell that many bought into the fabrications being told, hook, line, and sinker. Among the funnier replies, and corrections to same in italics:
Many people have left comments on my YouTube video on the topic. You can tell that many bought into the fabrications being told, hook, line, and sinker. Among the funnier replies, and corrections to same in italics:
(Author's note: there were many comments that were substantially similar to this one)
"So channels that are now with AOR are not to be believed because they all made statements against USCCA but you being with USCCA are credible?"
And you think lawyers selling prepaid legal make money by going to trial on these agreements???
"The bottom line is this: It is insurance, and exclusions apply. If there is any sniff or question about whether it was a good shoot, USCCA will not cover it."
"The bottom line is this: It is insurance, and exclusions apply. If there is any sniff or question about whether it was a good shoot, USCCA will not cover it."
And lawyers will make good on it???
"So channels that are now with AOR are not to be believed because they all made statements against USCCA but you being with USCCA are credible?"
The smoothbrain is strong with this one. Look at what the facts are. I presented them. They did not.
"Tell Kayla Giles how great USCCA is. She'll laugh in your face. Do more homework. She was dropped before she had a trial."
"I understand the concept of insurance and how it should be, but I also understand that insurance companies in general look for any means they can to save money - even at the expensive of polciyholders. I don't trust any insurance company whatsoever - be it health, auto, self-defense, and so on. The USCCA (and alternatives) may or may not make every effort to support their members, but I'll never know because I won't look into an insurance company. I'm content with Attorneys on Retainer and I have no issue with them hiring local counsel within my state in accordance with pro hac vice rules."
So you are siding with a convicted murderer, and you think that makes a valid point???
"I understand the concept of insurance and how it should be, but I also understand that insurance companies in general look for any means they can to save money - even at the expensive of polciyholders. I don't trust any insurance company whatsoever - be it health, auto, self-defense, and so on. The USCCA (and alternatives) may or may not make every effort to support their members, but I'll never know because I won't look into an insurance company. I'm content with Attorneys on Retainer and I have no issue with them hiring local counsel within my state in accordance with pro hac vice rules."
You don't trust insurance companies, and instead trust lawyers. And you trust a lawyer from out of state (pro hac vice) more than a local "good ol' boy." Ok... you do you.
Comments
Post a Comment
Your comment will be displayed after approval.
Approval depends on what you say and how you say it.