A Few Updates on an Older Post
This post to serve as an update on a post that is over 10 years old. The Rifleman has a strong memory (from time to time). On that post, a reader asked, "Any word? How did the remand hearing go?" For reasons that are not pertinent to this post, the Rifleman did not neglect to answer this question, but instead, postponed the answer until a more appropriate time. This time has come. In the remand, it is important to first state a particular fact: The judge that issued the ruling, Tom Gray, retired shortly after his errant ruling. As a matter of fact, four of his last five rulings (the author's brother's ruling being one of these) were overturned in appellate courts. Divorce ruling appeal successful . In a move that still strikes this author as exceptionally odd, Gray requested to be the judge on the remand hearing. Brother's lawyer argued that it is extremely peculiar to allow a civilian to hear a divorce remand, and the Sumner county Court agreed, and the sittin...
Where in US Constitution is powers given for gov to enter health care? Or, education. Oh, the list is long. The only meme that fits is a picture of a scowling, surly and inefficient DMV and asking, These are the people you trust with your health care?
ReplyDeleteRepeal, not replace. Repeal, not change. Repeal, not offer an alternative. Repeal, repeal, repeal.
You are correct. In my 41 years on this Earth, the other side has always accepted a marginal victory when it was all they could get. Similarly, I'll accept this marginal victory.
Delete