Dealing with failure
By now, we all know that President Obama and the Democratic leadership are following the game plans laid out in Saul Alinsky's book, "Rules for Radicals."
However, as the American public counters with knowledge and understanding of the lies they are being told, the far left responds, as I have stated before by the following mantra: 1) Lie, 2) Deny, 3) Make counter-accusations.
Some of the readers of this blog have asked me to elaborate on that mantra, as it seems so fitting. The reason for the request is because it can sometimes be difficult to determine which category the far-left response falls into.
I cannot go into too much detail, but this outline should provide enough framework for you to see how the far-left operates when confronted. That is the key, as Alinsky did not spend much time in how to respond to counter-attack, the left has fallen back to typical used-car-salesman approach to bad news.
So here is the outline of their game-plan:
1. LIE
A. Say the opposite of what you mean.
B. Rename things with a misleading title.
2. DENY
A. Attempt to place blame on others. It is preferable to place blame on opponents.
B. Say you did not really do something you really did. Refer to Rule #1 as a back-up.
3. MAKE COUNTER-ACCUSATIONS
A. Accuse others of what you yourself actually did. It is preferable to accuse opponents.
B. Use completely fabricated accusations. Try to avoid impossibilities.
C. Use verbal Hot Buttons in accusations to redirect the attention off of you.
i. Race card
ii. Socioeconomic differences
iii. Gender inequity
iv. any other perceived injustice or imbalance as needed.
However, as the American public counters with knowledge and understanding of the lies they are being told, the far left responds, as I have stated before by the following mantra: 1) Lie, 2) Deny, 3) Make counter-accusations.
Some of the readers of this blog have asked me to elaborate on that mantra, as it seems so fitting. The reason for the request is because it can sometimes be difficult to determine which category the far-left response falls into.
I cannot go into too much detail, but this outline should provide enough framework for you to see how the far-left operates when confronted. That is the key, as Alinsky did not spend much time in how to respond to counter-attack, the left has fallen back to typical used-car-salesman approach to bad news.
So here is the outline of their game-plan:
1. LIE
A. Say the opposite of what you mean.
B. Rename things with a misleading title.
2. DENY
A. Attempt to place blame on others. It is preferable to place blame on opponents.
B. Say you did not really do something you really did. Refer to Rule #1 as a back-up.
3. MAKE COUNTER-ACCUSATIONS
A. Accuse others of what you yourself actually did. It is preferable to accuse opponents.
B. Use completely fabricated accusations. Try to avoid impossibilities.
C. Use verbal Hot Buttons in accusations to redirect the attention off of you.
i. Race card
ii. Socioeconomic differences
iii. Gender inequity
iv. any other perceived injustice or imbalance as needed.
Comments
Post a Comment
Your comment will be displayed after approval.
Approval depends on what you say and how you say it.